Phishing scams: who pays for losses?

The number of phishing scams continues to grow: the Anti-Phishing Working Group recording its highest number of unique phishing web sites ever in June 2006. And, of course, financial services continues to be the biggest target for the phishers.

Clearly the losses from this type of financial fraud are high. But who pays? Well, in a case reported today, the bank did. Bank of Ireland has agreed to compensate customers who fell victim to phishing scams. However, this was a ‘goodwill gesture’, rather than matter of general policy.

Of course, it’s hardly surprising if financial institutions are reluctant to routinely compensate customers in such situations. The key issue for consumers is being able to demonstrate that they have taken adequate precautions to avoid falling victim to phsihing scams, as highlighted by APACS [APACS, the UK payments association] in one of its BankSafeOnline FAQs.

The onus will be on the customer to demonstrate that they have ‘acted with reasonable care’. The increasing sophistication of the phishers may make this harder to do.

We all know how complicated it can be to demonstrate that you have ‘acted with reasonable care’, so we’re providing a checklist that should help you. Pin it up on the wall and be sure to follow the recommendations.

  • Don’t fill out forms contained in e-mails. You should only fill out forms on secure web sites – after you have typed in the URL yourself, not clicked a link in an e-mail!.
  • Only enter information on a secure web site. Check that the URL starts with ‘https://’, look for the padlock symbol in the status bar of your browser to confirm the site you’re accessing and double-click the padlock to check the web site’s certificate and ensure that it really comes from that site.
  • Always use the latest version of your browser and install any security patches that have been issued.
  • Don’t divulge passwords, PINs, etc. to anyone else; and don’t even type confidential data like this on a web site unless you’ve gone through this checklist first.
  • Check bank account records regularly and report anything suspicious to your bank immediately.

Phishing scams: who pays for losses?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Lazarus targets defense industry with ThreatNeedle

In mid-2020, we realized that Lazarus was launching attacks on the defense industry using the ThreatNeedle cluster, an advanced malware cluster of Manuscrypt (a.k.a. NukeSped). While investigating this activity, we were able to observe the complete life cycle of an attack, uncovering more technical details and links to the group’s other campaigns.

Sunburst backdoor – code overlaps with Kazuar

While looking at the Sunburst backdoor, we discovered several features that overlap with a previously identified backdoor known as Kazuar. Our observations shows that Kazuar was used together with Turla tools during multiple breaches in past years.

Lazarus covets COVID-19-related intelligence

As the COVID-19 crisis grinds on, some threat actors are trying to speed up vaccine development by any means available. We have found evidence that the Lazarus group is going after intelligence that could help these efforts by attacking entities related to COVID-19 research.

Sunburst: connecting the dots in the DNS requests

We matched private and public DNS data for the SUNBURST-malware root C2 domain with the CNAME records, to identify who was targeted for further exploitation. In total, we analyzed 1722 DNS records, leading to 1026 unique target name parts and 964 unique UIDs.

Subscribe to our weekly e-mails

The hottest research right in your inbox